Saturday, September 22, 2007


Add Image
Picture of Fred Thompson, second wife, and youngest children
Note: I'll continue my "scum of the earth" series on Democratic Senators (Robert Byrd, Jay Rockefeller, Edward M. Kennedy, and others) next week.

Fred Thompson!!!!
Fred Thompson????

Former Senator Thompson's presidential campaign has experienced what stock traders call a "dead cat bounce." That refers to a stock whose price drops precipitously and then rises slightly, only to continue its downward trend. The concept behind the phrase is that, if it's dropped from a high enough point, even a "dead cat" will bounce.

Many evangelical Christians urged Thompson to enter the presidential race. However, he didn't exactly take off like a rocket. Evangelical Christian and Focus on the Family guru James Dobson expressed his disappointment with Thompson by saying the candidate had "no passion . . . no zeal."

Dobson got it right. Thompson is in his 66th year -- note: I'm 67 -- and he looks it and acts it. He's eligible for both Social Security and Medicare. Saddled with non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, Thompson is a chronic (mild) belcher and throat-clearer. He usually looks like a man who needs a good nap.
Let's face it: Fred Thompson is a boring guy. He's charisma-challenged. In many ways, he's a living embodiment of Arthur Branch, his character on "Law & Order," a man who never met a risk he wouldn't prefer to avoid.
Prior to announcing his candidacy on "The Jay Leno Show," Thompson ran for the presidency in a manner reminiscent of Warren Gamaliel Harding's Ohio-centric "Front Porch Campaign.".
In Thompson's case, the campaign consisted mainly of regular columns on, a web-site known for the almost total predictability of every comment that appears there. He also gave occasional speeches to the kind of conservative groups that still revere the sacred memory of William Howard Taft.
One observer described Thompson's speaking style as consisting of "conservative cliches . . . punctuated by long pauses." His style with essays isn't much better.
An excellent blogger on townhall, GenXDad, analyzed the many essays Thompson's staff produced for Townhall. He found the pieces only one-step up from the ancient Zen question that asks: "What is the sound of one hand clapping." The answer of course is: silence. GenXDad found nothing insightful or exciting in the Thompson essays. He describes reading them as an eerie experience.
How can a man produce so many essays and have so little to say? It's like Robert Frost at his lamest: "Good fences make good neighbors . . . something there is that doesn't love a wall."
Actuarial charts suggest that Thompson many not live long enough to see those beautiful children above graduate from elementary school. From the looks of him, his chances of making it to Election Day appear to be about 50-50.
He's announced that even with his now-dormant cancer, his life expectancy will be "normal." In fact, by Inauguration Day in 2009, Thompson will already have exceeded the life expectancy for someone born in 1942.
He's a man with an uneasy relationship with the future. As a Senator after 9/11, he announced that "Now is not the time to leave [his position]." Shortly thereafter, he left.
He should have stayed -- even though of course he could make A LOT more money on TV. .
In reading about Thompson's life, one keeps wondering: what on earth was the man thinking? I realize that a fair number (not enough) people like Fred Thompson, although I can't understand why. He's a guy who chucks social conservatives uner the chin -- but provides no coherent explanation of how he would lead this country.
For example, what was he thinking when he divorced Sharon Elizabeth Lindsey (Thompson), his wife of 26 years? Also, in his lucrative lobbying career, what was he thinking when one of his "pro bono" clients was the dictator of Haiti? And what was he thinking when his TV work on "Law and Order" consisted of laboring for Richard Wolf, a who can't figure out which he hates worse: Christians (usually portrayed as lunatics or perverts), Dick Cheney, or the Iraq War?
Was it all about the money? I'll rely on Jerry Maguire to answer that one.
Thompson isn't seeking the presidency with anything resembling enthusiasm. He says he wants the office because there are "things" he could only accomplish in that office. One is almost afraid to ask what those "things" might be.
For some months, I've been fearful of being too candid about some of the presidential candidates. I didn't want to do anything that would detract from the candidacy of Gov. Sarah Palin for vice-president (and, eventually, for President). But Sarah's character and accomplishments can stand on their own. I hope no one defects from Sarah because of something I say, but if they do, so be it. Fearful is not my style.
Thompson is not the man for the presidency. I don't see a single state he could carry in a general election that Giuliani, McCain, Huckabee, and Romney also couldn't win. Do you?
I expect his campaign -- lacking in passion, substance, and probably money -- to fizzle out. There's no evidence he can raise enough money -- or build a strong organization -- to compete effectively in the Super Tuesday states on Feb. 5, 2008.
Thompson's bowing out of the race, which may happen this calendar year, would be good for America and, frankly, good for him. "Run, Fred, run?" Only if he's running away from his bad decision to announce as a candidate for the nation's highest office.
Now is not the time, and he is not the man.
Stephen R. Maloney
Ambridge, PA
One lady formerly from Pittsburgh and now living in Tennessee responded to my post by saying that "Thompson was a great Senator, and he will make a great President!"
In fact, no one, including Thompson claims he was a great Senator. When he was asked what he had accomplished in his terms there, he responded (in paraphrase, but close), "Well, sometimes it the things you DON'T do that matter most." He did excel at not doing things. One thing he didn't do, because he left after saying he wouldn't, was to play any kind of positive role in the War on Terror (although he's recently said he's for it).
Instead, he worked for a TV producer -- Richard Wolf -- who has made the "Law and Order" series the television equivalent of As Lucy's Ricky Ricardo put it, "He has a heap of 'splaining to do."
Tomorrow, I'll post comments by my friend John Hawkins (of "The Forgotten Street") who hopes Thompson is a conservative. In my case, I've not seen anything that suggests he is electable. He's just another low-energy, aging white guy who will get chopped to ribbons in the general election. He's Bob Dole, circa 1996.
According to Gallup, the most popular male politician in America is Bill Clinton. Also according to Gallup, the most popular female -- politician or otherwise -- in the U.S. is Hillary Clinton (with Oprah second).
You figure it out.


Jim Baxter said...

Every September, I recall that is more than half a century (62 years) since I landed at Nagasaki with the 2nd Marine Division in the original occupation of Japan following World War II. This time every year, I have watched and listened to the light-hearted "peaceniks" and their light-headed symbolism-without-substance of ringing bells, flying pigeons, floating candles, and sonorous chanting and I recall again that "Peace is not a cause - it is an effect."

In July, 1945, my fellow 8th RCT Marines [I was a BARman] and I returned to Saipan following the successful conclusion of the Battle of Okinawa. We were issued new equipment and replacements joined each outfit in preparation for our coming amphibious assault on the home islands of Japan.

B-29 bombing had leveled the major cities of Japan, including Kobe, Osaka, Nagoya, Yokohama, Yokosuka, and Tokyo.

We were informed we would land three Marine divisions and six Army divisions, perhaps abreast, with large reserves following us in. It was estimated that it would cost half a million casualties to subdue the Japanese homeland.

In August, the A-bomb was dropped on Hiroshima but the Japanese government refused to surrender. Three days later a second A-bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki. The Imperial Japanese government finally surrendered.

Following the 1941 sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, a Japanese admiral said, "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." Indeed, they had. Not surprisingly, the atomic bomb was produced by a free people functioning in a free environment. Not surprisingly because the creative process is a natural human choice-making process and inventiveness occurs most readily where choice-making opportunities abound. America!

Tamper with a giant, indeed! Tyrants, beware: Free men are nature's pit bulls of Liberty! The Japanese learned the hard way what tyrants of any generation should know: Never start a war with a free people - you never know what they may invent!

As a newly assigned member of a U.S. Marine intelligence section, I had a unique opportunity to visit many major cities of Japan, including Tokyo and Hiroshima, within weeks of their destruction. For a full year I observed the beaches, weapons, and troops we would have assaulted had the A-bombs not been dropped. Yes, it would have been very destructive for all, but especially for the people of Japan.

When we landed in Japan, for what came to be the finest and most humane occupation of a defeated enemy in recorded history, it was with great appreciation, thanksgiving, and praise for the atomic bomb team, including the aircrew of the Enola Gay. A half million American homes had been spared the Gold Star flag, including, I'm sure, my own.

Whenever I hear the apologists expressing guilt and shame for A-bombing and ending the war Japan had started (they ignore the cause-effect relation between Pearl Harbor and Nagasaki), I have noted that neither the effete critics nor the puff-adder politicians are among us in the assault landing-craft or the stinking rice paddies of their suggested alternative, "conventional" warfare. Stammering reluctance is obvious and continuous, but they do love to pontificate about the Rights that others, and the Bomb, have bought and preserved for them.

The vanities of ignorance and camouflaged cowardice abound as license for the assertion of virtuous "rights" purchased by the blood of others - those others who have borne the burden and physical expense of Rights whining apologists so casually and self-righteously claim.

At best, these fakers manifest a profound and cryptic ignorance of causal relations, myopic perception, and dull I.Q. At worst, there is a word and description in The Constitution defining those who love the enemy more than they love their own countrymen and their own posterity. Every Yankee Doodle Dandy knows what that word is.

In 1945, America was the only nation in the world with the Bomb and it behaved responsibly and respectfully. It remained so until two among us betrayed it to the Kremlin. Still, this American weapon system has been the prime deterrent to earth's latest model world- tyranny: Seventy years of Soviet collectivist definition, coercion, and domination of individual human beings.

The message is this: Trust Freedom. Remember, tyrants never learn. The restriction of Freedom is the limitation of human choice, and choice is the fulcrum-point of the creative process in human affairs. As earth's choicemaker, it is our human identity on nature's beautiful blue planet and the natural premise of man's free institutions, environments, and respectful relations with one another. Made in the image of our Creator, free men choose, create, and progress - or die.

Free men should not fear the moon-god-crowd oppressor nor choose any of his ways. Recall with a confident Job and a victorious David, "Know ye not that you are in league with the stones of the field?"

Semper Fidelis
Jim Baxter
WW II and Korean War

Job 5:23 Proverbs 3:31 I Samuel 17:40


Stephen R. Maloney said...

Great comments about World War II.

About Mike Huckabee: I like Mike a lot. He's a good man. I don't give him a hoot in the hot spot of winning the nomination unless he can raise a ton of money, which I don't think he can. Then there's the problem of the general election. The Democrats probably will win Ohio and Colorado. We need somebody who can take some states from the Democrats (PA is a good chance, New Jersey is a possibility). The question isn't whether Mike is a good Christian or agrees with our pastor or priest. The issue is whether he can win states like PA & NJ, and I don't see any reason to believe that he can. Ohio elected a Senator (Sherrod Brown) who's MORE liberal than Hillary Clinton. Colorado elected a Hispanic Senator the last time around, and the loss of the Hispanic vote is going to turn that state (and perhaps Arizona) over to the Democrats. We need to look at politics very realistically.