Friday, September 21, 2007

SENATOR ROBERT W. BYRD: RACISM AND CYNICISM

This series on Democratic Senators who are members of what I call the "Scum of the Earth Club" will feature (today) Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, (tomorrow) Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, and (Sunday) Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia. Actually, the list could be almost endless, but I'll focus for now on these three individuals.

On November 20 of this year, Robert Carlyle Byrd will celebrate his 90th birthday. He's the senior Senator from West Virginia (Jay Rockefeller is the junior) and has held his office since 1959 -- the year I graduated from high school. He's the longest-serving -- and the oldest -- current member of the U.S. Congress. Unfortunately, he both looks and acts his age.

If, God forbid, President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, and Speaker Pelosi were to be killed in a terrorist attack, Robert Byrd -- as President pro tempore of the Senate -- would become President of the U.S.

Byrd is the last of the old-line segregationist Democrats. However, as the years have gone on, he's modified his positions on segregation and may be seen now -- by those with short memories -- as a minor champion of civil rights. When circumstances call for a change in his position, Byrd is quick to adjust.

Most people know that, many years ago, Byrd was a member of the Ku Klux Klan. In the media, this unfortunate element of Byrd's past gets portrayed as a short relationship reflecting some youthful indiscretion. However, that was not exactly the case.

In 1942, at the age of 24, Byrd joined the KKK. Soon after, he was elected -- unanimously -- as Exalted Cyclops, or leader, of his local Klan chapter. In his autobiography, Byrd saw that "election" as the beginning of his career in politics.

A local Klan leader, a man named Joe Baskin, told Byrd the following: "You have a talent for leadership, Bob. . . . The country needs young men like you in the leadership of the nation."

How did Byrd react to this high praise? As he describes it, "Suddenly lights flashed in my mind! Someone important had recognized my abilities. I was only 23 or 24, and the thought of a political career had never struck me. But strike me that night, it did."

During World War II, Byrd -- always skillful in self-protection -- didn't serve in the military. However, when he was 28, he wrote to notorious Mississippi race-baiter Theodore Bilbo his views about an integrated military: "Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."

In the 1950s, Byrd began the long process of attempting -- with limited success -- to disassociate himself from the Klan. He said then that he'd been interested in the Klan from 1942 through 1943 not because of its racist views but rather "it was strongly opposed to communism."

In 1997, at age 80,he said he's advise young people with political ambitions NOT to join the Klan -- by then only a tiny element in American society. Why precisely should they avoid the KKK? Because if one didn't, "it would inhibit [his or her] operations in the political arena." Not exactly a ringing denunciation of the Klan.

Years later, at age 88, Byrd sought once again to explain his associations with America's most notorious racist organization. He said, "I thought the Klan could provide an outlet for my talents and ambitions." He added, "I know NOW I was wrong." Now? At age 88? Talk about a slow learner.

A cynic (or a realist) would describe Byrd's relationship with the Klan in these terms. When an association with the group helped his political career, he was for it. When it hurt his career, he was against it. He's a political narcissist, nothing more.

Presumably, Byrd will leave the Senate feet-first. When he runs for re-election, as he will, he'll win again in a landslide, as he always does. He'll capture something like 90% of the Black vote -- cast by people who have little knowledge of the character (or lack thereof) or history of this thoroughly odious man.

Stephen R. Maloney
Ambridge, PA

4 comments:

  1. I don't like Senator Byrd to much, but what really gets me angry is the double standard. Can you imagine if Byrd were a Republican? Jesse Jackson, would run to D.C., to start the marches the second he found out. In a Senate of 100 though Byrd is at least interesting, and makes watching C-SPAN more enjoyable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The amazing thing is that Byrd is sometimes seen as one of the Senate's "great orators." As my piece shows, he has a penchant for choosing exactly the wrong word. Would a Republican Senator survive oral sex in the Oval Office? Or something like Chappaquidick? I don't think so. Democrats get held to a much lower standard. I'll write about that next week.

    steve

    ReplyDelete
  3. Carl V. "Sam" Lamb and I served side-by-side as rifle-squad leaders; Fox Company, 'Chesty' Puller's 1st Marines, 1st Marine Division. He wrote a book about our experiences in the Korean conflict, 1950-1951. He included my remarks about an incident in which one of our people threatened to punch-out a fellow squad-leader-guideon who had black skin.
    The page follows:

    + + +

    THE LAST PARADE
    by Carl V. "Sam" Lamb Page 296 (ref: 1951)

    James Fletcher Baxter

    "Sam" and I had a lot in common. We both resisted evil. After I
    got out of the hospital, Big Jim Causey told of driving along
    in his police cruiser and hitting a black man in his head
    with his pistol. He thought it was funny how the guy sprawled
    into the street. When he made this comment we were in a card
    game. I didn't say anything, but then he said he was going to
    kick the ____ out of Joe Goggins and I had heard enough.

    I said, "If you're going to try that, you'll have to go through
    me to get to him. I'm willing to give my life for a country
    that values each individual. If that isn't true, I don't want
    to fight for that country - but, it is true, so I'm not going
    to let you rob me of the very good reason I may lose my life
    tomorrow or next week. If you attack him, you attack me. I
    may lose, but I guarantee I will make it very expensive for
    you to get to him. Let me know what you decide."

    He got up from our card game and said, "I'll have to think
    about it."

    I said, "Let me know. I'll be here."

    He came back a little later and said, "You're right. I was
    wrong." I thanked him for his manliness.

    Joe Goggins came to me later and thanked me. He had wet eyes.

    + + +

    9/22/07 JFB
    Shortly after the above event, Jim Causey was called home for family
    member medical problems. On his way back to the States, he passed
    through a Naval medical facility. While there, he ran into my brother,
    Sgt. Howard "Barney" Baxter, 5th Marines, who had just been sent
    stateside for his Chosen Reservoir frost-bitten feet.

    Causey told my brother what had happened and said "how much it
    had changed his life." He said Joe and I had forgiven him and he
    would "never go back to the old collective point of view." He was
    really joyful because he was honestly able to forgive himself! He
    became a more manly man - a good Marine - with honor.

    I'm pleased the Rutgers women accepted Imus' apology. They, and
    others, need to forgive. We all need to grow. Good examples are
    always in short supply. God bless my Country and its Individuals.

    semper fidelis
    Jim Baxter
    Sgt. USMC
    WWII and Korean War

    5th Grade Teacher - 30 wonderful years! '57- '87
    vincit veritas

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    INDIVIDUAL VALUE - Gift of Y'shua JESUS
    by James Fletcher Baxter

    The Old World method of measuring human value was,
    and still is, by the group. Whether tribe, clan,
    city-state, color, ethnic, or gender, the Old
    World, ancient and modern, measures by the plural
    unit. Individuals had and have no value of them-
    selves but only as they were and are part of a
    collective.

    When Y'shua Jesus died on the cross, the veil of
    the Temple at the Holy of Holies parted from the
    top down. The individual believer in the congrega-
    tion had, for the first time, a face-to-face, one-
    on-one relation with his Creator. The Creator,
    Himself, had validated each individual for the
    first time.Thus, the Individual became the corner-
    stone for later human value measuring systems:
    socio-political, philosophical, religious, educa-
    tional, economic, etc., henceforth and forever.
    Western Civilization, America, English Law, civil
    Rights, the 'democratic' process, etc., all sprang
    from that single event. (Greco-Roman 'democracies'
    were 95% slave throughout their entire histories.)
    Biblical principles are still today the foundation
    under Western Civilization and the American way of
    life.

    Many social systems attempt to borrow ideas of
    "democracy" without the basic premise in The Indi-
    vidual. Such a system is only superficially and
    temporarily 'democratic.' The cornerstone of the
    democratic process is The Individual and the
    cornerstone of the value of The Individual is
    Y'shua Jesus! It is not possible to have one with-
    out the other. There is only One Source - there is
    no other.

    It is additionally interesting to note that all
    value measuring systems are based on the single
    definitive unit of the system. Ex: Number, Time,
    Distance, Weight, Heat, Money, Angle, Volume, etc.

    Only humanism makes the abusive error of measuring
    human value by the plural unit and attempts to
    build social structures, relations, and institu-
    tions thereon. Such man-made systems can only be
    abusive and oppressive because in reality there
    are only individual persons. Groups or collectives
    are merely convenient verbalizations about indi-
    viduals. They are not Reality.

    I have yet to see a 'group.' All I have ever seen
    are individuals.Have you ever seen a group - or is
    it a verbal convenience? Reality is only in the
    individual person. And, such a validation never
    derived from a human source without the initiative
    of the Creator. (The French Rationalists of the
    18th Century favored the fruit - but rejected the
    branch, tree, and root.)

    Today, wherever Y'shua Jesus is rejected, the
    group or collective is still the basic way of
    measuring human value - and/or human non-value.

    We thank the Lord God for revealing His validation
    of each individual person. We thank Him for creat-
    ing each person uniquely, in His image, and call-
    ing each one to a courageous ascension by Y'shua
    Jesus, who said, "I AM the Way..."

    Praise the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and
    His Son of Man, Y'shua Jesus.

    Reference: Exodus 25:30,40 Hebrews 9 Matthew 27:51
    Mark 15:38 Luke 23:45 KJV

    vincit veritas
    Jim Baxter



    Q: ? "How many more Columbines and VA Techs
    before we 'get it?' " jfb

    Collectivist 'solutions' will not solve problems caused
    by collectivism. Individual only.

    CHOOSE MIKE HUCKABEE ! ! !

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jim, thanks very much for your fine comments about race and the individual. I appreciate your visiting and hope you'll come again.

    steve maloney

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only individuals with Google accounts can comment.